Blog

Verifile is delighted to announce that we have secured a place on the G-Cloud 14 framework, further solidifying our commitment to providing exceptional background-checking services to the public sector. This achievement allows us to offer our trusted services through a streamlined procurement process, helping public sector organisations access vital solutions with ease and confidence.

Two Comprehensive Entries for Public Sector Needs

Our inclusion in G-Cloud 14 includes two distinct service entries:

DBS, Right to Work (RtW), and ID Checks: These services focus on essential requirements for verifying identities and employment eligibility. Learn more about this offering here.

Complete Screening Services, Including BPSS: Designed for more complex requirements such as Baseline Personnel Security Standard (BPSS) checks, these services cater to organisations with rigorous screening needs. Explore this service here.

Benefits for Public Sector Organisations

Being part of the G-Cloud 14 framework ensures that Verifile’s services meet the highest standards of security, compliance, and quality expected by public sector bodies. Verifile has been part of the G-Cloud framework for several years, highlighting our established reputation and consistent delivery of trusted solutions. Key advantages include:

Streamlined Procurement: Public sector organisations can now access our services without lengthy procurement procedures, saving time and resources.

Demonstrated Credibility: Inclusion in G-Cloud 14 signals that our solutions adhere to stringent public sector standards, including GDPR compliance and robust data security.

Support for Modern Work Practices: Our cloud-based solutions, such as Digital and Conditional Right to Work checks, are particularly relevant as many organisations embrace hybrid and remote working models.

Why G-Cloud 14 Matters

The G-Cloud framework is a cornerstone of public sector procurement, enabling organisations to source cloud-based solutions with confidence and efficiency. In G-Cloud 14, enhancements such as improved cloud-first strategies and updated compliance measures, and the ability to award 36-month contracts instead of the previous 24 months build upon the strong foundation of G-Cloud 13, making the framework even more adaptable to evolving public sector needs. Additionally, the application process for G-Cloud 14 was more rigorous, with stricter evaluations ensuring that only trusted and high-quality suppliers, such as Verifile, were successful. As Verifile continues to innovate and expand our services, being part of this framework strengthens our ability to meet the unique needs of public sector clients.

“Joining the G-Cloud 14 framework is a game-changer for businesses looking to expand into the public sector. It streamlines the procurement process, making it faster and more efficient for organisations to access our services. Additionally, it enhances credibility by demonstrating compliance with stringent public sector standards, such as GDPR and security requirements, ensuring that suppliers are trusted and reliable. It opens the door to a wealth of opportunities, enhances your credibility as a trusted supplier, and streamlines procurement processes for both you and your clients. To truly harness its potential, it’s crucial to present well-documented offerings and ensure they align with the framework’s cloud-first approach,” commented our CEO, Eyal Ben Cohen.

Explore Our Services

We invite you to explore our full range of background-checking solutions available through G-Cloud 14, including our specialised DBS, RtW, and ID Checks and Complete Screening Services designed for complex requirements. Whether you’re seeking instant checks or comprehensive and global screening for complex roles, Verifile is here to support your organisation’s goals with unmatched reliability and expertise.

This is the ninth instalment in our 10-part series on unmasking insider fraud and implementing effective risk mitigation strategies.

In our globalised economy, organisations are increasingly hiring talent from around the world. While this opens up a wealth of opportunities, it also presents unique challenges in managing the risks associated with international hires. In this post, we'll highlight the challenges organisations face when screening candidates from abroad, offer practical solutions, and emphasise the importance of comprehensive global checks to prevent fraud.

Recruiting internationally can introduce several complexities that aren't present in domestic hiring processes. These challenges include:

1. Limited Access to Records

   Different countries have varying levels of record-keeping and accessibility. In some regions, criminal records, employment histories, or educational qualifications may be difficult to verify due to:

   • Lack of Centralised Databases: Some countries don't maintain centralised records, making verification time-consuming.

   • Privacy Laws: Strict data protection regulations can limit access to personal information.

   • Political Instability: Regions experiencing unrest may have disrupted administrative services.

2. Language Barriers

   Documentation and communication in foreign languages can hinder the verification process. Translating documents accurately is essential to avoid misunderstandings.

3. Cultural Differences

   Different cultural norms can affect how information is recorded and presented. Understanding these nuances is crucial for accurate interpretation.

4. Fraudulent Documents

   The risk of counterfeit or altered documents increases with international hires. Without familiarity with foreign documentation standards, detecting forgeries becomes more challenging.

5. Time Zone Differences

   Coordinating with international institutions or references can be complicated due to time zone discrepancies, potentially delaying the hiring process.

Background: Peter Omoruyi, a convicted individual abroad, managed to secure employment working with vulnerable teenagers in the UK due to gaps in international screening. The failure to uncover his criminal history overseas exposed the organisation to significant risks and highlighted the importance of thorough global checks.

Solutions for Effective International Screening

Despite these challenges, there are effective strategies organisations can implement to mitigate risks associated with international hires.

1. Partner with Global Screening Providers

   Engage with reputable background screening companies that have international expertise. These providers offer:

   • Local Knowledge: Understanding of local laws, regulations, and processes.

   • Global Networks: Established connections with international institutions and authorities.

   • Multilingual Capabilities: Ability to handle documentation and communication in various languages.

2. Conduct Comprehensive Checks

   Implement a thorough screening process that includes:

   • International Criminal Record Checks: Verify any criminal history in all countries where the candidate has lived or worked.

   • Education Verification: Confirm educational qualifications with foreign institutions directly.

   • Employment History Verification: Contact previous employers abroad to validate work experience and performance.

   • Reference Checks: Speak with professional references who can attest to the candidate's character and capabilities.

3. Utilise Technology and Databases

   Leverage technology to access international databases and watchlists, such as:

   • Interpol Notices: Alerts on individuals wanted for criminal activities.

   • Sanctions Lists: Records of individuals under economic or legal sanctions.

   • Global Compliance Databases: Aggregated data on regulatory and compliance-related issues.

4. Verify Identity Rigorously

   Ensure the candidate's identity is authentic by:

   • Checking Passports and Visas: Validate the authenticity of travel documents.

   • Biometric Verification: Use biometric data where permissible to confirm identity.

   • Address Verification: Confirm residential addresses in previous countries of residence.

5. Understand Legal and Compliance Requirements

   Be aware of the legal considerations when conducting international checks:

   • Data Protection Laws: Comply with the data privacy regulations of both the UK and the candidate's country of origin.

   • Consent Requirements: Obtain explicit consent from candidates for international screening activities.

   • Employment Laws: Adhere to employment regulations regarding discrimination and fair hiring practices.

6. Provide Training for HR Teams

   Equip your HR professionals with the knowledge and skills to manage international screenings:

   • Legal Training: Understand international labour laws and compliance requirements.

   • Cultural Awareness: Recognise cultural differences that may impact the screening process.

   • Language Skills: Encourage proficiency in relevant languages or provide access to professional translation services.

Implementing global checks is crucial for several reasons:

1. Protecting Organisational Integrity

   Thorough screening helps maintain a trustworthy workforce, safeguarding the organisation's reputation and assets.

2. Ensuring Compliance

   Adhering to legal obligations in international hiring prevents regulatory breaches and potential penalties.

3. Mitigating Risks

   Identifying potential red flags early reduces the likelihood of fraud, misconduct, or other issues that could harm the organisation.

4. Enhancing Workplace Safety

   Ensuring that employees do not have a history of violent or unethical behaviour contributes to a safe and positive work environment.

Addressing challenges in international screening requires proactive measures:

Language Barriers

Solution: Utilise professional translation services and hire multilingual staff to accurately interpret documents and communications.

Time Zone Differences

Solution: Plan communications and requests considering time differences, and set realistic timelines for obtaining information.

Data Accessibility

Solution: Work with local authorities or partners who have access to necessary records, and stay informed about countries with restricted data access.

Cultural Sensitivities

Solution: Show respect for cultural norms and practices, and adjust approaches accordingly to build trust and facilitate cooperation.

Case Study: Strengthening Screening Processes

An international corporation faced challenges when a new hire from abroad was found to have misrepresented their qualifications and employment history. The incident led to project delays and financial losses.

In response, the company revamped its international screening process by:

• Partnering with a Global Screening Provider: Engaged a specialist firm with expertise in international checks.

• Implementing Tiered Screening Levels: Adjusted screening depth based on role risk levels.

• Enhancing Verification Methods: Introduced additional checks for education and employment history.

The result was a more robust screening process that significantly reduced the risks associated with international hires.

Advancements in technology have made international screening more efficient:

Automated Screening Platforms

Use platforms that integrate various checks into one system, streamlining the process and reducing manual effort.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning

AI can help identify patterns and anomalies in data that might indicate fraud or misrepresentation.

Blockchain Verification

Emerging technologies like blockchain can provide secure and tamper-proof verification of qualifications and records.

Conclusion

As the workforce becomes increasingly global, organisations must adapt their screening processes to address the challenges of international hires. By implementing comprehensive global checks, partnering with experts, and leveraging technology, businesses can mitigate risks and prevent fraud from abroad.

HR professionals and compliance officers play a vital role in this effort, ensuring that international hires contribute positively to the organisation without compromising safety or integrity.

In our final post of this series, we'll summarise the key takeaways and provide a roadmap for implementing effective fraud prevention strategies in your organisation.

Stay tuned for Part 10: "Implementing an Effective Fraud Prevention Roadmap" coming soon.

This is the eighth instalment in our 10-part series on unmasking insider fraud and implementing effective risk mitigation strategies.

In our previous posts, we've discussed the importance of comprehensive background screening and various tools available to mitigate insider fraud risks. One such tool that has gained prominence is media searches. In this post, we'll explore how media searches can uncover red flags during background checks, provide real-life examples, and discuss the compliance considerations that HR professionals and compliance officers need to be aware of.

What Are Media Searches?

Media searches involve examining publicly available information from a wide range of sources to gather insights about a candidate. These sources can include:

• News Articles: Local, national, and international news outlets.

• Online Publications: Industry journals, blogs, and professional forums.

• Social Media Platforms: Public posts on platforms like LinkedIn, Twitter, and Facebook.

• Public Records: Court records, regulatory filings, and official notices.

The goal is to identify any adverse information that may not appear in traditional background checks, such as criminal records or employment verification. Media searches can reveal involvement in litigation, regulatory breaches, unethical behaviour, or association with negative events.

How Media Searches Uncover Red Flags

Media searches can be instrumental in uncovering issues that candidates may not disclose or that standard checks might miss. Here's how they can help:

1. Identifying Unreported Criminal Activity

   Not all criminal activities result in convictions or are recorded in official databases. Media reports may highlight arrests, charges, or investigations that haven't led to a criminal record but are still relevant to an employer.

2. Revealing Professional Misconduct

   News articles and industry publications may report on professional misconduct, such as breaches of regulatory compliance, unethical practices, or disqualifications by professional bodies.

3. Highlighting Financial Irregularities

   Media coverage can expose involvement in financial scandals, bankruptcies, or fraud cases that may not be evident from financial checks alone.

4. Assessing Reputation and Public Perception

   Understanding how a candidate is portrayed in the media can provide insights into their reputation and potential risks they may bring to the organisation's image.

5. Uncovering Inconsistencies

   Discrepancies between a candidate's provided information and what's reported in the media can signal potential integrity issues.

Real-Life Examples

Let's revisit some cases from earlier posts to illustrate the impact media searches could have had:

1. Peter Omoruyi: A Missed Opportunity for Detection

   Background: Peter Omoruyi, a convicted sex trafficker, managed to work with vulnerable teenagers in the UK due to gaps in background checks. Traditional screening failed to uncover his criminal activities abroad.

   Media Search Impact: A comprehensive media search might have revealed international news articles or reports about his involvement in criminal activities, alerting the organisation to the risks.

2. Carl Stokes: Misrepresented Qualifications Exposed

   Background: Carl Stokes misrepresented his qualifications as a fire safety assessor, contributing to inadequate safety assessments in the Grenfell Tower tragedy.

   Media Search Impact: Industry publications or online discussions may have highlighted concerns or complaints about his work, providing early warnings about his misrepresentations.

3. Brandon Leung: Prior Incidents Revealed

   Background: Despite previous convictions for theft, Brandon Leung secured employment and later committed fraud by manipulating payment systems.

   Media Search Impact: Local news reports or court records available online could have disclosed his prior convictions, helping employers make informed hiring decisions.

Compliance Considerations

While media searches are valuable, they come with compliance and ethical responsibilities. HR professionals must navigate these carefully to avoid legal pitfalls.

1. Data Protection and Privacy Laws

   Under the UK GDPR, employers must ensure that the processing of personal data is lawful, fair, and transparent.

   • Lawful Basis: Employers must have a legitimate interest in conducting media searches, and the processing should be necessary for that purpose.

   • Transparency: Candidates should be informed that media searches are part of the background screening process.

   • Data Minimisation: Only relevant information should be collected and used.

2. Accuracy and Reliability of Information

   Media reports can sometimes be inaccurate or misleading.

   • Verification: Cross-reference information with multiple sources to confirm its accuracy.

   • Context: Consider the context and timing of the information. Outdated or contextually irrelevant data should be assessed carefully.

3. Avoiding Discrimination

   Employers must ensure that the use of media searches does not lead to unfair discrimination based on protected characteristics such as race, religion, or political beliefs.

   • Objective Assessment: Focus on information relevant to the candidate's ability to perform the job.

   • Consistent Application: Apply media searches uniformly across all candidates for similar roles.

4. Right to Be Forgotten

   Candidates have the right to request the removal of certain information from search engines under specific circumstances.

   • Consideration: Be aware that some information may have been legally removed and may not reflect current realities.

5. Documenting the Process

   Maintain records of the media search process, including sources checked and how information was used in decision-making.

   • Accountability: Documentation supports compliance with legal obligations and provides justification for hiring decisions if challenged.

Best Practices for Conducting Media Searches

To maximise the effectiveness of media searches while adhering to compliance requirements, consider the following best practices:

1. Develop a Clear Policy

   Establish a policy outlining when and how media searches will be conducted, ensuring it aligns with legal requirements and organisational values.

2. Obtain Candidate Consent

   Inform candidates that media searches are part of the screening process and obtain their consent.

3. Use Professional Screening Services

   Consider engaging reputable screening companies that specialise in media searches and understand compliance considerations.

4. Focus on Relevance

   Limit searches to information relevant to the candidate's suitability for the role.

5. Provide Candidates an Opportunity to Respond

   If adverse information is found, give candidates a chance to explain or contest the findings.

   

   Integrating Media Searches into Your Screening Process

   Incorporating media searches into your existing background checks enhances the overall effectiveness of your screening programme.

   • Timing: Conduct media searches after initial screenings to avoid unnecessary processing of personal data for unsuitable candidates.

   • Consistency: Apply the same search criteria and processes for all candidates in similar roles.

   • Collaboration: Work closely with legal and compliance teams to ensure adherence to all regulations.

Challenges and How to Address Them

Media searches can present challenges that need careful management.

Information Overload

Solution: Define clear parameters for searches to focus on relevant information. Use keywords related to professional conduct and the specific role.

Misidentification

Solution: Verify that the information pertains to the correct individual, especially if they have a common name. Cross-reference details like location, employment history, and education.

Biased Sources

Solution: Assess the credibility of sources. Give more weight to reputable news outlets and official records over personal blogs or unverified social media posts.

Conclusion

Media searches are a powerful tool in uncovering red flags that traditional background checks may miss. By identifying issues such as unreported criminal activity, professional misconduct, or reputational risks, organisations can make more informed hiring decisions.

However, it's essential to balance the benefits with compliance considerations. Adhering to data protection laws, ensuring fairness, and respecting candidate rights are paramount.

HR professionals and compliance officers must implement media searches thoughtfully, integrating them into a comprehensive screening strategy that safeguards the organisation while respecting individual privacy.

In our next post, we'll discuss how to implement continuous monitoring and re-screening processes to maintain ongoing vigilance against insider threats.

Stay tuned for Part 9: "The Importance of Continuous Monitoring and Re-Screening" coming soon.