Credit Checks: When a Disclosure Form Must "Stand Alone
Recent cases involving the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) emphasize the importance of employers allowing disclosures to obtain background checks from consumer reporting agencies to "stand alone" from every other document.
While the FCRA allows the disclosure form to also include an authorization, courts have recently cracked down on employers who include anything extraneous. In Syed v. M-I, Ltd. Liab. Co., 853 F .3d 492 (9th Cir. 2017), the Ninth Circuit of Appeal held that the inclusion of a liability waiver in the same document at the FCRA disclosure violated the "stand-alone" requirement.
In another case, Petco Animal Supplies, Inc., asked a Federal Court in the Southern District of California to approve a class-wide settle of a 2016 lawsuit based on allegations that its web-based application contained an FCRA disclosure containing a broad authorization of "any person" to provide "any and all information" to the consumer reporting agency, in addition to information relating to the laws of seven different states.
And on April 12, 2018, Frito-Lay, Inc., asked a Federal Court in the Northern District of California to approve a class-wide settlement of a 2017 lawsuit based on allegations that Frito-Lay violated the FCRA’s “stand alone” requirement by including additional language in its FCRA disclosure form including, among other things, a statement that “I have been given a standalone consumer notification that a report will be requested and used [.]” Frito-Lay agreed to a settlement of about $2.4 million to resolve the claims of roughly 38,000 class members.
2018 marks a new opportunity for employers to review and update their hiring forms to ward off FCRA lawsuits.